Maple Syrup
Acer saccharum
Sugar maple trees are tapped in late winter/early spring for sap, which is boiled down (approximately 40:1 sap-to-syrup ratio) to produce maple syrup. Thrives in cool, moist climates in Zones 3-8, preferring well-drained upland soils. Modern vacuum tubing systems have significantly improved commercial production efficiency.
Crop Snowflake Score
/acre
/acre
/acre
years
Overview
Growing Season
- Plant
- spring or fall – spring or fall
- Harvest
- late Feb to early Apr (tapping season) – late Feb to early Apr (tapping season)
- Frost-free days
- 80+
Yield
- Typical yield
- 24 gallons syrup/acre
- Productive lifespan
- 100 years
- Years to full prod.
- 40
- Labor
- 500 hrs/acre
Market Fit
Active Regional Buyers
Established crop with known regional buyers
Price Trend Stable/Up
Price trending upward due to growing demand
Supply Below Demand
Regional supply roughly balanced with demand
Multiple Buyer Channels
Multiple market channels: wholesale, retail, processing, and/or direct
Value-Added Potential
Strong value-added potential through processing, direct sales, or specialty products
Market Growth Projected
Strong market growth projected
Market Channels
Climate Fit
Hardiness Zone Match
Region's hardiness zone within crop range (3.0-8.0)
GDD Sufficient
GDD data not specified; crop is documented as viable at the regional hardiness zone
Precipitation Compatible
Regional precipitation (~40 in/yr) compatible with crop needs
Frost-Free Season OK
Frost-free season (160 days) meets crop requirement (80 days)
Chill Hours Met
Regional chill hours (1100) may not meet crop minimum (2500)
Climate Trend Favorable
Climate projections remain favorable for this crop in the region
Soil Compatibility
Soil Texture
Drainage
Infrastructure Fit
Equipment Compatible
Some specialized equipment needed but adaptable from existing vineyard infrastructure
Storage Available
Dry/ambient storage sufficient; commonly available on farms
Irrigation Compatible
Low water needs or rain-fed viable
Field Layout Suitable
Requires mature sugar maple woodland, not field cultivation
Labor Availability
Labor needs manageable with existing farm workforce
Processing Proximity
Processing/packing facilities within viable distance in WNY
Equipment Requirements
harvesting
Carries sap from tap to sugarhouse under vacuum. Replaces bucket collection and is the basis of modern yields per tap.
Vacuum substantially increases sap yield per tap and is what makes a compressed season economically survivable.
Health spouts replaced on a regular cycle to limit microbial contamination of tapholes and preserve tree health.
post_harvest
Removes 75% or more of water before the evaporator, cutting boiling time 50-75% and fuel use by up to 66%. Commercial units start around $3,000.
Finishes sap to syrup density. A larger traditional evaporator costs $4,000 or more excluding fuel.
Removes niter (sugar sand) to meet grade and clarity standards for retail and bulk sale.
Density measurement to the legal syrup standard; underdensity spoils, overdensity crystallises.
general
Houses evaporation and packing. Requires ventilation for steam and food-grade surfaces for packing.
Storage Requirements
Hot-pack sealed containers (cool, dark)
Temperature
50–70°F
Max Storage
730 days
Refrigerated (opened containers)
Temperature
33–40°F
Max Storage
180 days
Frozen (long-term)
Temperature
0–10°F
Bulk food-grade drums
Temperature
40–60°F
Max Storage
365 days
Finance Fit
Revenue Above Average
Gross revenue ($900/acre) below regional average
Input Costs Acceptable
Annual operating costs ($900/acre) within typical farm budgets
Payback Period OK
Very long establishment period (7-15+ years to full production)
Insurance Available
Federal crop insurance available
Revenue Per Labor Hour
Revenue per labor hour ($2) is below average
Grants/Subsidies
Grant and subsidy programs available (Specialty Crop Block Grant, EQIP, Beginning Farmer, etc.)
Economics Breakdown
| Avg Price/Unit | $37/per gallon syrup |
| Gross Revenue/Acre | $900 |
| Annual Operating Cost | $900/acre |
| Establishment Cost | $2,500/acre |
| Total Input Cost | —/acre |
| Net Return/Acre | $1 |
| Revenue/Labor Hour | — |
| Crop Insurance | Available |
Source: Cornell Cooperative Extension, Penn State Extension, USDA RMA, regional budget studies (2025)
Risk Fit
Manageable Pest/Disease
Low pest/disease pressure; manageable with standard IPM
Market Diversified
Market access diversified across multiple channels
Low Establishment Risk
High establishment risk; significant investment and years before returns
Climate Resilient
Hardy and resilient to climate variability in the region
Regulatory Burden Low
Minimal regulatory burden for production and sale
Diversifies Portfolio
Diversifies farm revenue away from grape monoculture
Known Risks
pest
Non-native invasive borer identified as the headline threat to sugar maple. Infestation triggers regulatory removal of host trees, destroying decades of sugarbush capital in a single season.
Periodic outbreak defoliator. Repeated defoliation reduces stored carbohydrate, lowering sap sugar content and, over successive years, tree vigour.
Outbreak defoliator of northern hardwoods; heavy years strip crowns in mid to late summer.
Late-season leaf skeletoniser. Damage is largely cosmetic in isolation but compounds other defoliation in outbreak years.
Leaf-mining and cutting damage during population peaks, reducing effective leaf area.
environmental
Extension identifies management-inflicted damage — soil compaction and logging wounds — among the main threats to sugarbush health. Damage is cumulative and effectively permanent on the scale of a tapping rotation.
Extension flags loss of diversity as a risk factor: a pure sugar maple stand carries concentrated exposure to any single maple-specific pest or pathogen.
climate
Sap flow requires alternating freeze and thaw. Shortening and shifting of that window, and reduced snowpack insulating the root zone, directly compress the tapping season.
Nutritional Yield
Nutrition data pending.
Research agents will profile Maple Syrup against USDA FoodData Central on the next maintenance pass. Per-acre nutritional yield will appear here once the per-100g panel is recorded.
Ecosystem Services
Carbon sequestration
- Standing forest carbonhigh
A tapped sugarbush is working forest. Trees remain standing and accumulating carbon across a production life measured in many decades, while yielding an annual crop — a combination essentially unique among the crops in this catalogue.
Applies when: Contingent on the sugarbush being retained as forest rather than converted.Evidence: Extension guidance·Confidence: high
Biodiversity
- Intact forest habitathigh
Production requires maintaining a functioning hardwood stand. Extension guidance to retain species diversity when thinning means a well-managed sugarbush supports substantially more forest-interior habitat than any field crop.
Applies when: Strongest where thinning retains non-maple components rather than releasing maple exclusively.Evidence: Extension guidance·Confidence: high
Water regulation
- Forest hydrology and snowpack retentionhigh
Continuous forest canopy and undisturbed forest floor moderate snowmelt timing, sustain infiltration, and reduce peak runoff relative to open land on the same terrain.
Evidence: Extension guidance·Confidence: medium
Soil health
- Permanently undisturbed forest soilhigh
No tillage occurs at any point. The principal soil risk is compaction from management traffic, which is why extension guidance restricts machinery to designated trails and frozen ground.
Applies when: Benefit is lost where machinery operates off-trail on unfrozen ground.Evidence: Extension guidance·Confidence: high
Climate adaptation
- Economic incentive to retain forest covermoderate
Sugarbush income gives landowners a recurring financial reason to keep land forested rather than convert it, which is itself a durable climate-adaptation outcome at the landscape scale.
Evidence: Extension guidance·Confidence: medium
Nearby Buyers
Data Sources
Every data point on this page is traceable to its source. Below you'll find the complete provenance trail — which sources were used, when data was last verified, and a full change history.
Primary sources: Data sourced from Cornell Cooperative Extension, Penn State Extension, USDA resources, and regional research.
Economics data year: 2025 · Region: lake_erie
44 tracked changes across 4 data categories
